The immediate task is to find the work delivered but not yet claimed, distinguish it from invoices already awaiting payment, and give each exception a resolution owner. An ordinary debtor-ageing report may not show how much time passed between service delivery and submission.
This checklist translates the current official guidance into a weekly claims review and a cash forecast. It supports the broader NDIS provider payments and payroll timing reference.
Key points
- The relevant age is the time from support delivery to claim submission.
- Claims submitted after 90 days may be held for up to 28 days for checks.
- A review window is neither automatic rejection nor a promised payment date.
- Assign evidence and follow-up actions before relying on receipts for payroll.
- Keep Support at Home deadlines separate from the NDIS process.
What the 15 October change means
The NDIA's 5 October notice says extra checks apply from 15 October 2026 to claims submitted more than 90 days after delivery. They may be held for up to 28 days, and further evidence may be requested. Claims submitted within 90 days continue through the usual process.
The distinction matters: a recently issued invoice can relate to a much older service. Track the underlying delivery dates, not just the invoice date. Do not treat the 90-day threshold as a reason to wait until the deadline; investigate billing exceptions promptly.
Start with an exception register
Run a list of delivered services that remain unsubmitted. Add submitted claims with unresolved queries, holds or rejections. Record the following for each item using secure systems and appropriate access controls:
- Dates: delivery, invoice, submission and latest status update.
- Amount and pathway: claim value and whether payment involves the NDIA, a plan manager or the participant.
- Evidence: the missing or requested material and who can retrieve it.
- Action: the next step, accountable person and follow-up date.
- Cash assumption: expected receipt, uncertainty and treatment in the downside forecast.
Use an internal early-warning threshold before 90 days that suits your workflow. This is a management control, not an additional NDIA rule. Investigate why a claim is old: incomplete records, coding questions and an unprocessed billing queue require different responses.
Test payroll against cash, not the ledger balance
Build a weekly cash forecast that includes wages, employment costs, tax, rent, suppliers and existing finance repayments. Separate ordinary expected receipts from claims with unresolved evidence or payment status. Do not count the same receivable again as both an expected payment and a proposed finance drawdown.
Illustrative example, not a sector benchmark: a provider has $70,000 opening cash, $50,000 of other expected receipts and $100,000 of outgoings over its review period. Without a separate $30,000 claim under review, closing cash is $20,000. Including it would show $50,000. The timing difference is $30,000, but the actual funding need depends on the lowest weekly balance and the business's required operating buffer.
Run a slower-receipt case and identify the first week cash falls below the approved buffer. Review spending commitments early while preserving safe service delivery. A delayed receivable and an ongoing operating loss need different decisions.
Ordinary payment guidance is not a universal fast-payment promise
The NDIA getting-paid guide, current as of 12 October 2026, says valid claims from my providers are usually paid within two to three business days. Payment can take about ten business days where the provider is not recorded as a my provider or checking is needed.
Use observed collections for each pathway when forecasting NDIS provider payments. A plan-manager invoice is not the same event as an NDIA payment request. The invoice requirements checklist can help the billing team check completeness before submission.
Mixed providers: review the September-quarter aged-care claims too
The Department's Support at Home payment guidance lists 29 November as the ongoing-service claim deadline for the July-to-September quarter. Late claims require a reason; different deadlines apply to other funding accounts and participant exits. Services must meet the applicable eligibility and delivery requirements.
Keep that worklist separate from NDIS ageing. Reconcile delivered services, claims and contribution collections by program. A combined revenue total can conceal two different backlogs and produce an unreliable payroll forecast.
Prepare a funding discussion around verified gaps
Bring the exception register, recent management accounts, debtor ageing, payment history and weekly forecast. Explain which receipts are uncertain and how repayments remain affordable if they arrive late or are not paid.
A working-capital facility and invoice finance have different eligibility and repayment structures. Neither should be assumed to fund a claim under review. The NDIS invoice finance guide explains the receivables questions to raise with a lender. Confirm permitted use, exclusions, fees and security before relying on a facility.
Questions owners ask
Does passing 90 days mean a claim is automatically rejected?
No. The NDIA notice describes extra checks and possible requests for evidence, not automatic rejection.
Can I assume an affected claim will be paid on day 28?
No. A possible review period is not a guaranteed settlement date. Use the actual claim status and keep a downside scenario.
Which NDIS loan documents help explain a payroll gap?
Start with financial accounts, claim and debtor reports, payment history, committed outgoings and a forecast that includes repayments. Label uncertain receipts clearly.
Sources and method: Official NDIA and Department of Health, Disability and Ageing guidance reviewed on 19 October 2026 is linked beside the facts. The register, forecast and example are Provider Capital's practical interpretation, not mandatory reporting formats or sector benchmarks. General information only, not individual accounting, legal, compliance or credit advice. Finance availability depends on lender assessment.